Qantas Error Fare: First Class to Los Angeles from Sydney $4,299 return @qantas.com (several dates incuding xmas holidays)

I got offered 2 x J MEL-SYD-LAX return. The ticket status on my booking has changed from F to J, but Qantas says under my “pay-later” payment method I have to pay $45,907.40 for the two J tickets. Hopefully this will update. It’s all a big balls-up really.
 
Australia's highest-earning Velocity Frequent Flyer credit card: Offer expires: 21 Jan 2025
- Earn 60,000 bonus Velocity Points
- Get unlimited Virgin Australia Lounge access
- Enjoy a complimentary return Virgin Australia domestic flight each year

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

lol recent sale SYD-LAX Business $7299 return....
$12-$13k crikey...!
You’ve got to remember this first mistake fare covered dates over holiday periods. I’ve looked at the alternative dates for what I’ve booked next year and J is $14k return.
 
You’ve got to remember this first mistake fare covered dates over holiday periods. I’ve looked at the alternative dates for what I’ve booked next year and J is $14k return.
Question was what's a normal J sale fare for the route. Reply was quite outlandish.
 
I bought this fare and have been offered business.

I think it is pretty good considering everything.

Australia has zero consumer protections in this regard. Qantas makes a mistake and can legally just refund, consumer makes a mistake and the cost is unlimited. So Qantas offering business for the same price is pretty good considering the legal options it has. (I don’t agree airlines should have no liability for anything, but in Australia they don’t so we have to work with that)

Also, and separately, many on other platforms reported having their PNRs cancelled … I’m curious as to why many on here have alternative business class flights but others have been cancelled.
 
I bought this fare and have been offered business.

I think it is pretty good considering everything.

Australia has zero consumer protections in this regard. Qantas makes a mistake and can legally just refund, consumer makes a mistake and the cost is unlimited. So Qantas offering business for the same price is pretty good considering the legal options it has. (I don’t agree airlines should have no liability for anything, but in Australia they don’t so we have to work with that)

Also, and separately, many on other platforms reported having their PNRs cancelled … I’m curious as to why many on here have alternative business class flights but others have been cancelled.
Quite a few on my Facebook group have also been offered J.
Some of them are members here on AFF but not all.
I think it will turn out that QF have offered J to everyone.
 
Maybe anyone with status?
I've got Platinum on QF and was offered J. Those on reddit/ozbargain mentioned they had no status and also offered J so it seems everyones got the same offer.

Whilst my booking is yet to be updated to J my booking has had some text comments added to it (I've removed the "KIQ"? code/line with dates times and my email):

"---INVALID USA FIRST CLASS FARE REFER TO KIQ (xx_x)"
"--- LAX FIRST CLASS FARE ERROR EMAIL SENT TO (email here) ON 23 AUG 2024 ---"
 
I bought this fare and have been offered business.

I think it is pretty good considering everything.

Australia has zero consumer protections in this regard. Qantas makes a mistake and can legally just refund, consumer makes a mistake and the cost is unlimited. So Qantas offering business for the same price is pretty good considering the legal options it has. (I don’t agree airlines should have no liability for anything, but in Australia they don’t so we have to work with that)

Also, and separately, many on other platforms reported having their PNRs cancelled … I’m curious as to why many on here have alternative business class flights but others have been cancelled.
That’s the thing, no consumer protections per se, but you could have a case in contract law, depending how ‘obvious’ the mistake was.

While OzBargainers and AFFers know this was a mistake, it’s entirely possible a completely non-informed consumer would see this, and being 4x the price of economy, might actually have thought this *was* pricing for first class. But i doubt there are many people in that category.
 
That’s the thing, no consumer protections per se, but you could have a case in contract law, depending how ‘obvious’ the mistake was.
This. I think the reason Qantas are offering business very quickly is that even their own Conditions of Carriage only apply if the mistake is "reasonably obvious". This is no $100 fare - you are still talking $4200+.

Someone who really wanted to push this could argue that the mistake is not "reasonably obvious", as Qantas offer classic first rewards return SYD-LAX for 325,600 points plus about $1,300 in cash. Using points in a points-plus-;pay Qantas offer around 0.7c per point. Calculated out, Qantas offer fares on this route for around approx $3,600 on some of their valuations. Given this, it could be argued that this fare is not so far out of line with price points that Qantas offer as to be deemed "reasonably obvious" as a mistake. As Qantas imposed this condition into the Terms of Carriage without the ability of the consumer to choose, the ability of Qantas to just interpret this condition to their advantage will be limited under contract law.

I suspect that someone who really wanted to push this (and to risk getting on the QF blacklist) would have a fighting chance of getting the fare honoured.
 
Last edited:
This. I think the reason Qantas are offering business very quickly is that even their own Conditions of Carriage only apply if the mistake is "reasonably obvious". This is to $100 far - you are still talking $4200+.

Someone who really wanted to push this could argue that the mistake is not "reasonably obvious", as Qantas offer classic first rewards return SYD-LAX for 325,600 points plus about $1,300 in cash. Using points in a points-plus-;pay Qantas offer around 0.7c per point. Calculated out, Qantas offer fares on this route for around approx $3,600 on some of their valuations. Given this, it could be argued that this fare is not so far out of line with price points that Qantas offer as to be deemed "reasonably obvious" as a mistake. As Qantas imposed this condition into the Terms of Carriage without the ability of the consumer to choose, the ability of Qantas to just interpret this condition to their advantage will be limited under contract law.

I suspect that someone who really wanted to push this (and to risk getting on the QF blacklist) would have a fighting chance of getting the fare honoured.
Good point! I hadn’t thought about the comparison to classic award pricing!
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top