MEL_Traveller
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2005
- Posts
- 28,983
Re: Qantas: non-stop Australia (Perth) -Europe (London) Boeing 787 flights set to soa
And I would agree with your points if the restriction was imposed retrospectively. But it wasn't. If you don't like the terms and conditions of the sale - don't buy.
I appreciate you don't think this has to do with shareholders... but if if it's not them as the ultimate beneficiary, who is? As a passenger I haven't seen too many benefits.
unfairly? by the same token are does it also mean that its bad luck when a competitor enters the market with foreign investor with deep pockets who can pour a fair amount of cash into the company???
why isn't it an ordinary circumstance? Any other airline can set up and compete against Qantas without the same restrictions placed upon it in terms of who can invest in it.
At the end of the day they are both businesses, and therefore should be either competing on the same terms, or if a government imposes a restriction, it should be compensating for the limitations placed on the company. Once again this has nothing to do with the shareholders. It's to do with the business being able to access the same type of investors.
As to your analogy.. it would be more akin to you and a competitor both having blocks in the same street but because you were there first and bought it off the government you are not allowed to develop, but the newcomer can.
And I would agree with your points if the restriction was imposed retrospectively. But it wasn't. If you don't like the terms and conditions of the sale - don't buy.
I appreciate you don't think this has to do with shareholders... but if if it's not them as the ultimate beneficiary, who is? As a passenger I haven't seen too many benefits.