- Joined
- Jun 19, 2006
- Posts
- 7,822
I think a member earlier referred to a Citi analyst's take. Here's an excerpt from an online article in The Australian.
And the Mumbrella website (marketing and PR-focused, I think) had this to say:
A report by Citi Research analyst Samuel Seow said prior to Covid-19, the Qantas (red tail) airline carried 31 million passengers, and offered about 40 million seats for sale.
Mr Seow said given that 20 million seats represented 50 per cent of Qantas’ capacity, the airline “could not be expecting redemptions anywhere close to this number”.
“It appears the 20 million seats may be priced, so only a low percentage are redeemed,” wrote Mr Seow.
“We estimate $70m is the actual investment in the change (and) our back of the envelope equation suggests this equates to potentially 10 per cent of 20 million seats being expected to be redeemed.”
Mr Seow’s report surmised that the downward adjustment Qantas made in its forecast earnings for the Loyalty sector in the 2024 financial year, from $550m to around $500m to $525m, was largely an accounting change, given that Classic Plus seats were not available until July 1.
“Overall, we largely see the actual cash investment as small,” he said.
“Subsequently, we estimate only modest increases in engagement, but similarly limited risks of cost increases.”
And the Mumbrella website (marketing and PR-focused, I think) had this to say:
Phoebe Netto, founder and managing director, Pure Public Relations
That may not actually be the case, but it shouldn’t be this hard to make that distinction. Ultimately, what they have announced will have a neutral impact on their reputation at best, and to some, it will actually increase the cynicism towards the brand.
Qantas has a history of announcing credits and rewards that were convoluted, unusable and with changing conditions. From confusing pandemic credit extensions to unclear deadlines, the airline has proven itself a bad gift giver many times over.
Luke Holland, head of strategic communications, Think HQ
All of which makes the Qantas announcement seem like a sleight of hand – a distraction from deeper cultural problems. And I’m not sure Aussies will buy that in the long term, even if they can use their Points for the purchase.
Sally Branson, crisis communications expert
My understanding is that for a new CEO, this is the sort of program change that can herald a new era – but when your base is already revolting – is this the right thing to be focusing on to create a new era and leave the crisis of the past behind? Going by the comments on the Qantas Points Collector page, it has been poorly received, and the general gist is “tell me you’re giving me less for more” and that the move is “bad” and hard to understand.