- Joined
- Nov 16, 2004
- Posts
- 47,512
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- SkyTeam
- Elite Plus
Which is much less than the $40M quoted during the standoff between QF and PER's owners.
$14 million according to the release
14 million on the surface, how much behind the scenes.
14 million on the surface, how much behind the scenes.
which was always going to be the case ...... The cost of manning those facilities will be worn by the Federal Government.
(https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/skys...ff-after-14m-taxpayer-injection-ng-b88325272z)The West Australian said:The first 787 service is due to leave Perth on 1 March 2018 about 7.30pm and arrive in London at 6am. Departure from London will be about 11am, arriving in Perth at 10am the next day.
(https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/skys...ff-after-14m-taxpayer-injection-ng-b88325272z)
Just as a matter of curiosity, do these timings match the previous slots that Qantas has leased out at LHR?
QF owns enough slots. They have 4 slot pairs with 2 currently leased to BA.Possibly also suggests a rescheduling of QF1/2 given the current tag-team ops.
Afaik (all LHR times)
QF1 arrives 6.30am, departs as QF10 about 1pm.
QF9 arrives 1pm departs as QF2 about 9pm
I suspect very difficult to get another early morning slot, which suggests QF1 might be pushed back to a late evening SYD departure (would also help to reduce the crush hour in the QF F Lounge)
This is the one downside to the arrangement.
Having no lounge access after you go through customs and immigration.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
price premium for everyone to offset the amount of seats they will have to block to make this work. The 787 simply does NOT have the range to do this route without blocking a large amount of seats.I would do this flight in J but would struggle to in Y
So I reckon the pricing strategy would be as follows
1/ price premium for the premium cabins (whats the alternative? A380 sky beds which are inferior)
2/ price discount for Y
The extra $$ for J prob can offset lower revenue in Y and the flight can still make a profit given the lower cost of the 787
price premium for everyone to offset the amount of seats they will have to block to make this work. The 787 simply does NOT have the range to do this route without blocking a large amount of seats.
Interesting - if they defacto had to block a lot of seats, then yes a premium for Y is justified - and people will pay if they are almost guaranteed a shadow beside them
Interesting - if they defacto had to block a lot of seats, then yes a premium for Y is justified - and people will pay if they are almost guaranteed a shadow beside them
Hope that isn't the case for premium cabins. Imagine J costing nearly as much as F does now...According to this article, the cost premium for the new service could be 40%!
Non-stop Perth to London flights could cost 40 per cent more: aviation expert