QF32 388 - emergency landing in SIN after Engine failure

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why four? One is dead. Another needs a workshop rebuild after having the foam put through it. As far as I know the other two are fine...
Just an assumption that the other two are also likely to be among the oldest ones in the fleet, and it seems that Qantas is not wanting to operate the older engines given they still have C on the ground at LAX and they chose only to return E and F to service at this time. But that is just speculation and an assumption and not based on any published facts.

So if not completely new, I expect there is going to be some significant costs associated with bringing them to a state where Qantas is confident they are operationally ready.

Either way, its certainly going to be expensive and not returning to service in a hurry :(.
 
. . . Qantas is not wanting to operate the older engines given they still have C on the ground at LAX and they chose only to return E and F to service at this time.

Minor point but I'm almost 100% certain I saw D on the ground at LAX on Thursday, not C.
 
Minor point but I'm almost 100% certain I saw D on the ground at LAX on Thursday, not C.
Quite probably. But same goes for both C and D, being on the ground in SYD and LAX. Not sure when b was due to finish maintenance at FRA, but certainly seems QF is not planning to rush it back into service at this time. So my assumption is that they are waiting for RR to do something - may be to provide some form of assurance, new engines, mods etc. We can only speculate at this stage.
 
Airbus have stated the three birds for QF will be delivered this month so that will take some of the pressure off.
 
so that is three now, not the two previously expected?
That always seems to be a constantly moving target, but before all of this happened, we were expecting 1 in November, 2 December, and 1 February.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Yes, MSNs 47, 50 and 55 are all this month. 47 was meant to be mid Nov.

Wow, 3 in Dec. How amazing and fortunate for QF (although I'm sure that they had planned to have 9 flying around prior to the QF032 accident).
 
That always seems to be a constantly moving target, but before all of this happened, we were expecting 1 in November, 2 December, and 1 February.

Yes, MSNs 47, 50 and 55 are all this month. 47 was meant to be mid Nov.
So do we know whether the Feb delivery is still on track? Twill be good to see them coming on-line shortly.
 
Am I correct in thinking that 47 and 50 are the two that have been in storage for a year or so?
 
Update from the ATSB.



Manufacturing problem potential factor in QF32 engine failure
The ATSB has issued a safety recommendation about potential engine problems in some Airbus A380 aircraft.

The safety recommendation identifies a potential manufacturing defect with an oil tube connection to the high-pressure (HP)/intermediate-pressure (IP) bearing structure of the Trent 900 engine installed in some A380 aircraft.

The problem relates to the potential for misaligned oil pipe counter-boring, which could lead to fatigue cracking, oil leakage and potential engine failure from an oil fire within the HP/IP bearing buffer space.

In response to the recommendation Rolls Royce, affected airlines and safety regulators are taking action to ensure the continued safe operation of A380 aircraft. The action involves the close inspection of affected engines and the removal from service of any engine which displays the suspected counter-boring problem.


News:


(See Investigation: AO-2010-089 - Inflight engine failure - Qantas, Airbus A380, VH-OQA, overhead Batam Island, Indonesia, 4 November 2010 for the full recommendation)
 
QF Management : Its a boring bit of news (ducks).

You would think the loss of hp oil would also trip a sensor / alarm.
Thats good work, and understandable, and unfortunate for the lathe operator who worked with something not true. One misaligned lathe could also do a lot more duff parts - so they will or should look at other bores. So who did the micrometer work - eh?

But it does not answer the oil vent pipe, also suspected early, and other matters. For fatigue to set in early (these engines not that old) indicates some wrong modeling. Still good news for RR - replacing a part is cheaper than a flawed design (subject to metal tests coming back).
 
What is interesting, and predictable I guess, is the way in which the mainstream media have taken Dave's interview and quite distorted it for their daily dose of madness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Staff online

Back
Top