QF9 / QF10 Perth

What's even worse about heading east to connect is the options are either a ridiculously early PER departure or a red eye. Then you have to deal with the disaster that is the SYD domestic to international transfer. Using east coast logic, QF really should have an international tag leg from PER to SYD with international service that takes you straight to the international terminal. :rolleyes:
MEL also have flights to NZ...
 
All the more reason to fly another airline to/from Europe imo.
Just not MH/MAS if earning QFF (edit: to add SC) is important to you, esp if flying in a prem cabin and only earning QFF in flexY esp if in a rev booking.
If a rew booking, then maybe MH/MAS is ok burning QFF points from PER to KUL to LHR.
---

Ah, horrid, some days a 737-800 that MH uses PER - KUL and vv!
 
Last edited:
The 787 will continue to fly between Melbourne and Perth, albeit only on Thursdays operating as QF773.

Also, I think it would be good if Qantas brings forward the arrival times of its Canberra-Perth service into PER. The current CBR-PER flight arrives after the departures of the LHR and CDG services, so that’s clearly not ideal. This could and should be easily fixed by bringing QF857’s arrival times forward and offering a truly one-stop connection for Canberrans travelling to Europe.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

It’s probably a bonus if you don’t have to fly on a 787…but not so if you have to fly on a 737.

My choices, 380, then 350, then 777. After that 330 or drive.
JB is this related to Boeing's current issues and/or fundamental concerns with the 787 design? i.e. the "box" around the battery?

I do wonder how many other short sighted design decisions Boeing made with the 787!
 
JB is this related to Boeing's current issues and/or fundamental concerns with the 787 design? i.e. the "box" around the battery?

I do wonder how many other short sighted design decisions Boeing made with the 787!
A search will find many ‘whistleblower’ reports about the 787. But, as I see it, nothing they’ve done since around 2007 (or so) is built or designed to the same standard as the entire 7x7 series that made them so successful. I have friends who have flown both the 777 and 787 and their preference, to a man, is the 777. A much older design, but from the old company. Is that likely to be an issue on your flight…probably not. But, it really annoys me when I hear people calling it the Dreamliner, when it’s only an accountant’s dream.
 
Last edited:
Yep - by now everyone's heard the line about engineers vs accountants at Boeing.

Having previous lives in both flying and within the "millitary industrial complex" I have to keep my mouth firmly shut on the details, but more will keep coming to light thanks to Boeing's recent attitude and behaviour... a lot more!

That said, I'd rather fly any rubbish new Boeing than on an alternative platform that required transiting places like IST (made worse in the case of airlines with ex-mil crew from certain nations!)

BTW: Almost forgot my usual QF line ... "Qantas: the National Airline of Sydney"
A search will find many ‘whistleblower’ reports about the 787. But, as I see, it nothing they’ve done since around 2007 (or so) is built or designed to the same standard as the entire 7x7 series that made them so successful. I have friends who have flown both the 777 and 787 and their preference, to a man, is the 777. A much older design, but from the old company. Is that likely to be an issue on your flight…probably not. But, it really annoys me when I hear people calling it the Dreamliner, when it’s only an accountant’s dream.
 
Sadly I don't disagree with jb's assessment, though have a 787 flight in a few days. Back in the 90s I was offered a job by Boeing in Seattle which was amazing but in the end I decined for my own reasons, but at that point it was not about concerns of the engineering or build of the aircraft they were putting out.
 
PER to ADL, if its that one, yes, not that many flights a day.
5.55pm or so, to get to ADL at near 10.30pm.
Even to SYD/MEL, its not that regular.
Nothing can be done, but just hope that the 4 hr wait does eventuate, and you do get a seat on the replacement.
I live in ADL, and know that QFd PER - ADL is not that regular, ie, not every 2/2.5 hrs apart.
---
Ah sorry just saw connecting to MEL, and arr near midnight!
 
Last edited:
QF hasn't updated their website:

Transiting in Perth​

London (LHR), Paris (CDG) and Rome (FCO) flights​

Customers who are transiting through Perth to London (LHR), Paris (CDG) or Rome (FCO):
  • From Melbourne or Sydney, will complete border formalities in Melbourne or Sydney.
  • From other Australian destinations, will complete border formalities in Perth.
Customers who are transiting through Perth from London (LHR), Paris (CDG) or Rome (FCO):
  • To Melbourne or Sydney, will collect their bags and clear customs and immigration in Melbourne or Sydney.
  • To other Australian destinations, will collect their bags and clear customs and immigration in Perth.
 
Those that are traveling on QF9 and wants a TRS claim, and they will need to do it at T1 arrival counter and then transfer to T4?

QF9 leaves from T4 PER. TRS counter is in T4 right after immigration but before security (international, you'll already have passed through domestic security) , just to your right.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top