AustraliaPoochie
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2014
- Posts
- 7,729
Someone ought to upgrade these scammers on the "appropriate" grammar.
Companies are usually pretty fanatical about Corp branding - the “TELSTRA” in capitals just looks wrong and stands out like DBs when used with the “T” logo - normally it’s just T-logo + “elstra” (lowercase).This looks almost legit:
View attachment 327889
Only because i know it's not my payment date have i ignored this email. Others would likely click through...
My better-half was pestered by three mobs like this, a few years back. She turned right when the right arrow went green, the bloke coming the other way didn't like the fact the person in front of him was stopping at their red light so he swerved to the left of them & blasted through the red light straight into my better half's car.08 84480644
02 43024883
08 84480673
07 31336301
08 62206654
This is on my 6 year old daughters phone. All calls from Credit Corp. From the little I have searched they are a debt collector buying debt cheaply and trying recover full debt.
Someone please explain how scumbag companies such as this are allowed to operate? Can't block them as they use different numbers each time.
I honestly can't say. In the normal situation of a real debt collection company, this would be a legitimate call as they have incorrect details for someone. What I can't tell is whether they're a legitimate company though ... but if they are legit, they don't have a way of knowing that the number they have is bogus 'til you tell them so.Thanks @Forg. I've only had this number for daughter since February so every chance it was registered to another person.
I don't have anything to discuss with Credit Corp. I would like them to stop calling my daughter. Do I answer and hang up immediately? The government really needs to intervene in the situations.
As far as I'm aware the company is literally Credit Corp. Very dodgy practices.I honestly can't say. In the normal situation of a real debt collection company, this would be a legitimate call as they have incorrect details for someone. What I can't tell is whether they're a legitimate company though ... but if they are legit, they don't have a way of knowing that the number they have is bogus 'til you tell them so.
Short answer is ... Optus couldn't be bothered chasing what little money they'd get back, it's not what they focus on; they'd write the money off, except there're companies willing to buy the "bad debt" off them so Optus pays at cents on the dollar & it's still more'n they'd have got back if they just wrote it off.If some of the reviews/reports are true how does a company purchase debt so cheaply and then try to recover full amount plus interest? If they purchase a $1000 debt for $100 or $200 from say Optus why doesn't Optus offer the person in debt to pay debt off cheaply instead of involving these dodgy companies?
They don't necessarily want good grammar in a scam text or email. There's too much likelihood that they will reach someone who has a reasonable education, a bent for investigation, and an interest in justice.Someone ought to upgrade these scammers on the "appropriate" grammar.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
How can you block someone from taking a screen-shot? The legit use of that functionality is so widespread that it makes no sense to block the ability due to a bit of illegitimate usage … it’d be like banning all aircraft ‘cos 911.It wouldn't work if internet developers make it impossible to cut and paste logos.
But that would never change, so we will keep getting things like this.