Oneworldplus2
Established Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2008
- Posts
- 3,049
I'm pretty sure that both first and second jab contain same amount of mRNA.
I'm hoping it's this rather than starting to run into vaccine hesitancy though I guess the second of your options relates to this. Anyway increased Pfizer will flow very soon so we get to see if it is that pretty quickly.Something has happened to the NSW state delivered jabs this week, a significant drop from 45-50K daily to 31K today and 28K yesterday.
I'm guessing they've either exhausted their Pfizer supply or AZ appointments are rebooking for Pfizer now there will be more supply shortly.
@QF WP - FWIW, I had minimal side effects from either jab. Second one I was expecting to be hit, but wasn't. I was at work, telling someone how I maybe had a headache and was thinking of taking some panadol. They suggested if I thought I should, then I should. So I did. Another dose of panadol later in the afternoon, and I was fine.Happy to report only a slight inflammation at the needle site for both of us and a little slower the next morning (that may be because of Lions losing) .
Next jab already booked for 3 weeks time - whilst I'm not sue the efficacy is at it's best after only 3 weeks, I understand the second jab is a much greater concentration of the virus so higher likelihood of after effects. Good to get it done on a Saturday, so have the Sunday to recover at home
I'm hoping it's this rather than starting to run into vaccine hesitancy though I guess the second of your options relates to this. Anyway increased Pfizer will flow very soon so we get to see if it is that pretty quickly.
Happy to report only a slight inflammation at the needle site for both of us and a little slower the next morning (that may be because of Lions losing) .
Next jab already booked for 3 weeks time - whilst I'm not sue the efficacy is at it's best after only 3 weeks, I understand the second jab is a much greater concentration of the virus so higher likelihood of after effects. Good to get it done on a Saturday, so have the Sunday to recover at home
Craig Kelly's mobile number has been widely publicised if you want to let him know.Is there anything I can do to publically express my disgust at such a miserable excuse for a human being?
Not sure how figures will be calculated when jabs go in 12-15's arms - its already started happening unofficially. At the moment it should be a minimal impact, but from next week 12-15s should have a growing impact.I'm hoping it's this rather than starting to run into vaccine hesitancy though I guess the second of your options relates to this. Anyway increased Pfizer will flow very soon so we get to see if it is that pretty quickly.
I wish they had proceeded with the UofQ vaccine. Not sure if I am representative of thousands, but I would have taken the UofQ vaccine even if it resulted in false HIV tests. I engage in zero risk behavior in terms of HIV - I would have happily taken an HIV test as a condition precedent to taking the UofQ vaccine to provide the medical record that I was negative. My husband feels the same. I think the false positive HIV would be problematic for others, but it would have been an additional vaccine that might have had decent uptake.With the benefit of hindsight they may have done a deal with Pfizer earlier, but we had two promising vaccines in the AstraZeneca vaccine (which has proven to be a better vaccine than Pfizer despite the fear over extremely rare side effects) and the UoQ vaccine that unfortunately didn't pass the trials.
Pfizer logistically is more challenging to roll-out due to the cold storage requirements and also is more expensive. Originally our government intended Pfizer to play a much smaller role in our rollout, but as the UoQ vaccine failed due to false HIV positive tests and also later when the fears grew over extremely rare side effects of AstraZeneca the role of Pfizer in the rollout was expanded.
There was an article a while back saying that one person over 60 had died with the rare side effect of AZ in Australia, but 995 people over 60 had died with COVID (probably over a thousand now) despite far more people being vaccinated than exposed to the virus. With those odds I know what I'd pick.
I wish they had proceeded with the UofQ vaccine. Not sure if I am representative of thousands, but I would have taken the UofQ vaccine even if it resulted in false HIV tests. I engage in zero risk behavior in terms of HIV - I would have happily taken an HIV test as a condition precedent to taking the UofQ vaccine to provide the medical record that I was negative. My husband feels the same. I think the false positive HIV would be problematic for others, but it would have been an additional vaccine that might have had decent uptake.
I wish they had proceeded with the UofQ vaccine. Not sure if I am representative of thousands, but I would have taken the UofQ vaccine even if it resulted in false HIV tests. I engage in zero risk behavior in terms of HIV - I would have happily taken an HIV test as a condition precedent to taking the UofQ vaccine to provide the medical record that I was negative. My husband feels the same. I think the false positive HIV would be problematic for others, but it would have been an additional vaccine that might have had decent uptake.
I had 2 teens minimally affected, sore arms only. Then 1 teen who slept and slept and didn't feel great and resulted in 1 day off school. All good now.@QF WP - FWIW, I had minimal side effects from either jab. Second one I was expecting to be hit, but wasn't. I was at work, telling someone how I maybe had a headache and was thinking of taking some panadol. They suggested if I thought I should, then I should. So I did. Another dose of panadol later in the afternoon, and I was fine.
Have the Teen booked in at Boondall this weekend for jab 1 and I'm hoping they're also minimally affected.
very good pointI think the problem would have been the antivaxers screaming "Covid vaccines give you aids"
Hmm, vax slowing this week ... ? enthusiasm? blip? end of a push ?
Snap.
Still a ton of people in the regions who haven’t yet really been exposed to Covid or prevented from doing something that vaccinated people can.With NSW approaching 75% first dose, I'd say they're starting to run out of willing participants and that will bring the national rate down. Still a good result. I always thought 80% was ambitious but I am happy to say I've been proven wrong and we'll cross that line. 90% seems like a push without the stick coming out. It may be that the fence sitters will need to see others freedoms.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements