It is actually the other way around.If you don't fee qualified to vote then just don't. Either vote informal or don't vote at all and pay the fine. But it's easy enough to educate yourself about who is who and what their policies are. I'd be embarrassed to come out on a public forum and say that I couldn't be coughd to figure such a simple thing out for myself.
It is actually the other way around.
It is embarassing the candidates have no character. Dull. It is certainly a different era in politics.
It is actually the other way around.
It is embarassing the candidates have no character. Dull. It is certainly a different era in politics.
Someone in Woolies is not known for their addition/multiplication skillsI really love Tasmania.
Went to Woolies to buy a packet of hot cross buns.You got a bonus domino for that and our 2 oldest grandkids are collecting.
Walk in and there is a big display of said buns on special-2 packs for $5.60.I hate that when you only want 1.
Go up to the display and note that the packets are $2.56 for 1.:shock:
Someone in Woolies is not known for their addition/multiplication skills
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
The ABC fact check unit doesn't seem to be very effective.This from the 7.30 report-
I don't disagree with you. Voting shouldn't be compuslory.so what? it's an election, not the search for the next Gold Logie winner. As I said before, don't bother voting if you can't be bothered to find out the bare minimum. There really should be some sort of qualification to vote beyond the requirement of being 18 or older.
I don't disagree with you. Voting shouldn't be compuslory.
Likely to vote Liberal in an electorate Labor has held since prehistoric times.
Polls predicting a romp to Liberals.