Beyond all their usual idiocy, and the whole East-West debate??
It was in the paper today that they are spending
$12M to renovate a sporting ground for the St Kilda football club. The local council of Kingston is coughing up an additional
$5M. The club (
~$5M) and the AFL (
$6M) will make up the difference. Remember the AFL is absolutely loaded. They made
$1 Bn from the last TV deal. Where is all that money going?
It just seems manifestly unnecessary to me for taxpayers to subsidise the richest football code in the country, and one of the richest clubs. Especially when there are so many other more deserving organisations struggling to get by.
To put things in context St Kilda moved their base from Moorabbin to Seaford in 2010 following a
$9.5M development down there. I don't see any problem with the Seaford facilities except that the players have to drive a little further to get to training. People talk about the club's "spiritual home" (e.g. ~1950s-2010) being in Moorabbin, but if you want the real spiritual home of the club it is the St Kilda Cricket Ground (aka Junction Oval) where they played their early matches and continued right up until after WWII.
I think the real winners here are:
1) St Kilda players who don't have to drive as far in their $100K+ cars from their $1M+ houses in the inner suburbs to training
2) People of Seaford who will hopefully get the run of the existing ground when the club vacates. Mind you a local club is unlikely to have the funds to adequately maintain such facilities
The losers:
1) State taxpayers
2) Kingston council rate payers
Maybe I am just cynical?
But hey, I wonder if they will cough up another $30M-$50M to redevelop Victoria Park so Collingwood can move back there from the Westpac centre... After all it is their "spiritual home" too?
NB / Caveat - I am not a St Kilda supporter, but even if I was, this seems like a waste of public money to me.