M
Misha
Guest
Ok I'm now revealed as a old fart.
don't be silly....
... that was revealed ages ago
23 hours is waaaay too long without a smoko!
Ok I'm now revealed as a old fart.
don't be silly....
... that was revealed ages ago
23 hours is waaaay too long without a smoko!
You must be kidding? On Connies their pilots, crews and passengers smoked big time. You came off that flight and all your clothes needed to be dry cleaned to get out the smoke smell!!! But back then no one complained.
Back then you could spend a few hours in the coughpit, sitting on the jump seat as long as you could talk flying, sports, sex, etc with the pilots to keep them from getting bored. I did that many times and was the Goofer to get them coffee. S**t now the memories are flowing back. Back then flying in the pointy end of the plane was good. Really good. Now you just get food first and get to immigration first. cough what have we done to ourselves? Killed the joy of flying? Yup. cough.
I miss flying on the IP / Jump seat and the views out the coughpit windows.
ahh too true. i used to smoke on airlines (even during toe 2000s! bless Europe!) and i remember the old coughpit view (i used to be petrified during landing).
i used to fly on staff (standby) fares in europe (ex-partner was airline employee) and say in jump seat. worst ever (due to time frame) was Madrid - Toronto!!!
I was for years fearful of flying Olympic Airways till I got on and saw the FA (with the most beautiful moustache I had ever seen - of course we argued most of the flight as to whether he had shaved before starting work that morning :mrgreen: ) walking down the aisle checking seat belts with a ciggie hanging out of his mouth. I swear on a bible - when I sat down the opposite aisle had a woman in one seat and her dog on the next!
Loved it!
Butt they could only manage that duration when the engines were new. It was not too long into their operational life that the endurance was limited by oil consumption of the R-3350 engines rather than fuel consumption."The L-1649A holds the record for the longest-duration, non-stop passenger flight, during TWA's inaugural London-to-San Francisco flight on October 1–2, 1957, the aircraft stayed aloft for 23 hours and 19 minutes (about 5,350 mi/8,610 km at 229.4 mph/369.2 km/h)"
Yes you read that right, 23 hours and 19 minutes in the air between Sfo/Lhr. Oh my aching BUTT.
Butt they could only manage that duration when the engines were new. It was not too long into their operational life that the endurance was limited by oil consumption of the R-3350 engines rather than fuel consumption.
As much as I love reminiscing about aviation history, given that its most unlikely that any Velocity partner airlines will operate L-1049 / Super Connie, perhaps we need to allow this thread to get back on topic.But nice when the pilots "tuned" / synced the 4 engine revs and prop pitch to give the cabin a nice soothing Humm / Buzz to put you to sleep. I seem to remember New York to Dublin to Rome and return.
Super Connie coughpit and pax seats:
CF-TGE Connie Interior
From what I see, for how I fly, QF and their partners are far ahead of DJ in the A$ cost of retaining Gold on the 2 FFer programs. YMMV.
May I ask (genuninely.....I'm not intentionally swiping at you ), why does it matter if QF is cheaper than DJ or vice versa if you have no trouble retaining Gold (or silver, or platinum). You mentioned many times that you fly a lot so are you concerned for when you don't fly as much?
Believe it or not, this WAS a feature of one or more pre 2005 iteration(s) of the QFF SC/TC earning tables.:shock:..
The idea is that they'd change the SC earning table to exclude F SC on flights shorter than a set distance, which would exclude all but a few of the AA fares. ...
My budget does not extend to buying Y+ or J seats, I mostly fly in -Y exit rows as it is my buck and I see those seats as the best value for the $.
DJ do have a bit of work to do before then can expect QF WPs and Golds to alter who they spend their flight money with.
Why would do AA / QF do that? To make DJ's FFer program more competitive to that from AA / QF and to lose revenue? Please DJ's offer is not that good now that they have retracted their SC earn offer back to their original, canned PP Card Lounge access and are not competitive.
Just remember AA offers their EXP FFers unlimited F upgrades on all domestic flights and 8 system wide J upgrades. You think AA will remove those so DJ be able to compete?
Please DJ are so far down the worldwide FFer program pecking scale that AA probable will probable never see them.
You keep comparing a domestic Australian program (Virgin Australia's) to a domestic US program (AA's), as if they're competing and really care about the other?
AA wouldn't be changing anything about their YUP's and QF wouldn't be losing customers if they changed how YUP's earned SC, as anyone using YUP's to get cheap status isn't loyal to QF.
It's like comparing apples and ... flamingos. No where near even close.
Doing that and starting to fly DJ gives me no status, no Lounge, no quick check-in, and maybe no chance to get an exit row seat, etc until I gain Gold.
Am I correct in reading that DL does not accrue SCs? Anyone know why? If I was choosing US domestic flights and had choices between QF points and SCs on AA or DJ points on DL I know what the choice would be!!
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements