pauly7
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2004
- Posts
- 5,363
Yes, and I think it would definitely be an opportunity for a Qantas bashing, so I think that's why they've taken the most conservative approach.
Many have said VA made a commercial decision to keep flying, rather than a safety decision, but ultimately I think with their reputation playing a big part in QF's decision, their's is therefore just as much a commercial decision not to fly. After all, an incident would have irrepairable damage to their brand and bottom line.
It's very interesting from a marketing POV, we discussed it at an industry function tonight....
The general perception is that VA are taking a calculated risk flying.
QF Group are playing it very safe.
TT are probably losing less money grounded than in the air
In a few months when this has blown over (no pun) what will consumers/general public remember....: QF didn't take any chances, VA took a considered punt.
Not a great look for VA. At all.
Doesn't matter what the facts are. Will be interesting to watch...
PS ABC24 just aired a rumour that VA need the cashflow.... That's something VA PR need to stomp on pretty quickly!