Re: Oz Federal Election 2013 - Discussion and Comments
However, the fundamental point here is that any talk of "mandate" without a *massive" proportion (at the very least a supermajority) of primary votes going to one party in both houses, plus the states, is absurd. It's just a word thrown around by those who want to try and pretend people whose opinions they don't like don't deserve to be heard purely because they disagree.
55% of the population didn't vote for the Coalition. Riding roughshod over their desires by claiming "mandate" is simply wrong.
Between them they had as much of the primary vote as the Coalition did last week.How could they?
They didn't have one or need one. They just did what the Greens told them to do.......
However, the fundamental point here is that any talk of "mandate" without a *massive" proportion (at the very least a supermajority) of primary votes going to one party in both houses, plus the states, is absurd. It's just a word thrown around by those who want to try and pretend people whose opinions they don't like don't deserve to be heard purely because they disagree.
55% of the population didn't vote for the Coalition. Riding roughshod over their desires by claiming "mandate" is simply wrong.
Last edited: