lovetravellingoz
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Posts
- 12,704
So if it’s already not allowed then Vic doesn’t need another rule of the curfew to enforce the current restrictions.Was talking to some less emotional Melburnians and they don’t see the big deal with the curfew. Maybe it’s even a little storm in a teacup distraction for everyone to focus on. If anything it maybe could have been a bit later. But after all, in “normal times” what are people doing out in evenings/nights ?
1) eating out in restaurants ....not allowed
2( going to pubs/bars etc .... not allowed
3( going shopping for food .... shops shut (maybe would have stayed open a little later)
4) picking up takeaway (yes 9pm would have been more reasonable)
5) visiting friends, going to parties .... not allowed
6) going for a drive .... not allowed
7). Going to or from work ... allowed
8) going to or from hospital ... allowed
The main reason that could be allowed that isn’t because of the curfew is exercise. Well gyms and pools are closed. So it’s all those people who go jogging in the park after dark that are the ones most affected by the curfew.
It probably should be extended to at least 10pm though if it’s not gone by daylight savings time.
Yes we will agree to disagree but it’s healthy debate. No other operator sees anywhere near the freight volume of the APG and peak is over by Feb so everything was running normal. AP had everything pretty much under control until the MEL restrictions kicked in.
Is that a roundabout way of saying something was wrong in Victoria???
Yes it was called a high level of unknown community spread, and with new cases having overwhelmed what contact tracing could have coped with.
Fair point, which has been confirmed subsequently by the hotspot discussion paper/analysis.Yes it was called a high level of unknown community spread, and with new cases having overwhelmed what contact tracing could have coped with.
Yes and I’m in a low to middle management role with one arm of them currently so know full well what is going on behind the scenes. I’ve constantly said there have been mistakes and things aren’t perfect. I’ve seen the millions on millions spent on parcel sorting facilities and equipment but unfortunately there is still plenty more that needs to be spent and is currently being rolled out. Unfortunately not every PDC has the technology currently due to new/temporary centres being set up for the overflow. Anyway yes I’ll refrain from posting on this subject on this threadPlanning for surge capacity?
[Disclosure: used to work there many years ago]
Basic functions. Accept mail/parcels. Find where it needs to go. Route it. Deliver it. No different to airport luggage except geographics.
Decades ago they had the solutions to sort envelopes quickly and efficiently and economically and right up there on top of their game.
They haven't evolved to handle parcels properly. Just look at the airport automated luggage receiving terminals.
Parcels shouldnt be lying on the floor with people wandering around manually sorting them.
Anyway this is not the right thread and I've had my say. Over to the topic at hand.
Fair point, which has been confirmed subsequently by the hotspot discussion paper/analysis.
So Melbourne gets a curfew (on top of more Stage 4 restrictions that should have worked) because it’s contact tracing could not cope with cases.
It doesn’t feel like the right answer but it is what it is.
Fair point, which has been confirmed subsequently by the hotspot discussion paper/analysis.
So Melbourne gets a curfew (on top of more Stage 4 restrictions that should have worked) because it’s contact tracing could not cope with cases.
It doesn’t feel like the right answer but it is what it is.
IMHO The curfew was necessary to deal with a percentage of the population who felt the other measures didn't apply to them because they know better.
IMHO The curfew was necessary to deal with a percentage of the population who felt the other measures didn't apply to them because they know better.
So the number of reported curfew breaches feels about 100 per day.That plus the rule breakers. Too easy for some to try and sneak out to visit a friend, or family member, and if pulled up to just say out exercising etc. 5km rule and curfew helps to greatly reduce that. Plus makes enforcement much easier.
CV19 relies on population mixing to spread. Reduce the mixing and you reduce the spread.
So the number of reported curfew breaches feels about 100 per day.
It doesn’t feel right to have a curfew on 5million people for the sake of say 4200 breaches over 6 weeks that may or may not have been detected without the curfew.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Perhaps it's all this time cooped up that increases people's sensitivities but quite honestly blaming Melbournians for allowing this to happen
So the number of reported curfew breaches feels about 100 per day.
It doesn’t feel right to have a curfew on 5million people for the sake of say 4200 breaches over 6 weeks that may or may not have been detected without the curfew.
Haha, well wasn’t that a similar point you had previously? Just ‘lock up’ or isolate the positive cases rather than restrict movement, quarantine all travellerS, State borders, etc of everyone. The net effect might be people reluctant to get tested.A good point. But then, again what is the cause and effect? How many "breaches" (i.e. people moving about, mixing and spreading the disease), would there have been without the curfew? A bit like the argument "Oh, look what's the big fuss about, there's only been 700 COVID deaths, so why did we need any restrictions?".
So the number of reported curfew breaches feels about 100 per day.
It doesn’t feel right to have a curfew on 5million people for the sake of say 4200 breaches over 6 weeks that may or may not have been detected without the curfew.
And the people I associate with are mostly critical of DA and the measures.
I think people tend to make friends or associates with similar thinking, values and background.
From inner city Melbourne, I saw rule breaches over the past months all the time.
People even admitted them to me. Some boasted even. Police were not very helpful. They would/could not investigate incidents even caught on CCTV. They apparently had to be on-the-spot incidents with the police present.
Those who think that 99% of Melburnians were abiding by the rules are really living in a fantasy bubble. It simply wasn't the case where I live and still isn't the case even today.
The compulsory wearing of face masks and the curfew at least made it harder for the some of the rules to be so easily flaunted.
The curfew didn't make things much more difficult for most. Things were largely closed anyway. It probably should have been brought in months ago.
I hate all the rules too. All the rules are a form of infringement on personal liberties. There's not too much to like about them.