- Joined
- Nov 16, 2004
- Posts
- 47,512
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- SkyTeam
- Elite Plus
It was a little more: (Aircraft Accident Investigation Preliminary Report)200hrs doesn't seem like much experience.....
As for the Pilot:
It was a little more: (Aircraft Accident Investigation Preliminary Report)200hrs doesn't seem like much experience.....
200hrs doesn't seem like much experience..... having just spent 100hrs watching a 16 year old drive - it's bugger all IMHO.
It was a little more: (Aircraft Accident Investigation Preliminary Report)
View attachment 159554
As for the Pilot:
View attachment 159555
207 Meh
Its a long time especially with twin 16yr doing the L at the same time200hrs doesn't seem like much experience..... having just spent 100hrs watching a 16 year old drive - it's bugger all IMHO.
Thats the problem.But who else had more relevant time in a 737 Max???
No point if one is experienced while the other is not - in an emergency that can quickly become effectively 1 pilot plus a bystander.Gosh- they were both very young in general! It might not be correct in every case, but somehow I prefer it if at least one of the two pilots up the front is a bit more experienced and mature.
Well the poor pilots became essentially defacto test pilots without an ejection seat and parachute. Apparently UA(ALPA) thinks they can, but human factors suggest that the best skills deteriorate in an emergency.
Whilst I don't understand much of the technical side of it, this pilots video explaining the prelim report was damning about what he thinks happened...
Not much anyone can do without the luxury of altitude.It would be interesting to get their take on how they would have handled it, rather than just saying they could have.
It’s good to be a late adopter. I read somewhere that QF also had a habit of adopting new design later in the production lineNews just coming out now
-Production per month to drop to 42
-Boeing admits fault with erroneous MCAS
20% drop in production would probably see Virgins first delivery slip into next year now
China confirmed on Tuesday it would join the review, while Canada, the United Arab Emirates, and Singapore previously said that they would join the panel. Officials told Reuters that Australia, EASA, Brazil, Indonesia and Ethiopia are also expected to take part.
Former National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Christopher Hart, who is chairing the review, told reporters on Friday that it would begin later in April and would take about 90 days.
Good. Having regulators from OUS countries involved will make me much more confident about whatever results come out of this. But unless things look very very different in a few years from now, I still will do what I can to avoid these (just for me personally).
Questions:
1. Why did the pilots retract flaps at 1000ft (and not higher)?
2. Is that normal?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements