whatmeworry
Established Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
- Posts
- 4,623
Your bias is showing somewhat.
The NBN was well behind and well over budget long before it was inherited, and, as with most policies of that government, the budget was grossly underestimated.
Where did you come up with this HFC fiction? The current HFC cabling will support far in excess of 1Gbps. And as for 'coughpy', HFC provides high speed broadband to a large proportion of the world, including the U.S., who enjoy some of the fastest and cheapest internet in the world.
Stop drinking the LNP kool-aid. 1Gbps maybe if I am one metre from the node and I am the only person on that node at 3 am.
This from former ex-BT CTO: "FTTN a huge mistake”
“Fibre to the cabinet is one of the biggest mistakes humanity has made,” he said. “It ties a knot in the cable in terms of bandwidth and imposes huge unreliability risks … It is a shame, but I understand why people have made that decision. They have made it worldwide, by the way.”
There were a range of problems with FTTN-style rollouts, according to Cochrane. To start with, he said, it was easy for the streetside cabinets to be vandalised. “Once the local bandits have recognised that there is a car battery in the bottom, you can bet your bottom dollar that a crowbar will be out and the battery will keep disappearing,” he said.
Other problems, he added, went to the speeds which FTTN offered (generally considered to be up to 80Mbps at the moment, although they may be extended in future) compared with fibre, which will in future off 1Gbps on Australia’s NBN infrastructure. “What are the leaders doing? There is Sweden in greater Europe, and in the Far East you have Korea, Japan and China. They have a minimum level of 100 Mbps. That is where they start,” Cochrane said.