Predictions of when international flights may resume/bans lifted

I had not realised Pfizer now have final FDA approval, I have heard some people say “If it’s so safe why only an interim approval for use?”. While I don’t think it will move the die hard anti vaxxers it takes another argument out and might reduce concerns for those who hesitate. The higher vaccination rate the faster we can rejoin the world.

 
My fear is that there won't be much time difference between phase B and C (less than a month) - but the whole "slow, gradual opening" might mean we wait 3 months between phases even though we've met the threshold.

I really hope they disband National Cabinet as soon as we get to Phase B.
 
We have been preparing a variety of plan Bs and Cs for when we get to go OS.We are planning to fly to SIN mid Feb and fly back mid May.
I am worried that we won't be allowed straight back into QLD without HQ.So the plan is flying back to SYD and then on to any State that will accept us from NSW that QLD lets people in from.Hoping either Tas or SA.Have 2 weeks holiday there then back home.
The joys of being retired.
 
We have been preparing a variety of plan Bs and Cs for when we get to go OS.We are planning to fly to SIN mid Feb and fly back mid May.
I am worried that we won't be allowed straight back into QLD without HQ.So the plan is flying back to SYD and then on to any State that will accept us from NSW that QLD lets people in from.Hoping either Tas or SA.Have 2 weeks holiday there then back home.
The joys of being retired.
Similar issues for SA residents with very few flights into Adelaide. SQ and QR only. Qantas won't. Unless we can disembark in Darwin. But if state borders are no longer shut then it's moot.
 
Similar issues for SA residents with very few flights into Adelaide. SQ and QR only. Qantas won't. Unless we can disembark in Darwin. But if state borders are no longer shut then it's moot.
And also for us here in the ACT. Connections to your final destination are definitely something that will have to be sorted out.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ade
Why? I think this has been one of the successes of the last year. It’s been much more functional than COAG ever was and should decide some of the other things that used to be the remit of COAG.

National decisions need to go back to the federal cabinet.

"National Cabinet" was about aligning state decisions. I think once we get to Phase B and definitely C, we can go back to CAOG which is just a forum of the state leaders. National Cabinet is not a cabinet, despite the name. Cabinets have solidarity.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Front Page of The Australian - "Premiers: time to lead us out" - "Reopening Australia with thousands of Covid-19 cases ... will not lead to more deaths over six months than waiting for virus numbers to be contained at low numbers, updated modelling by the Doherty Institute is expected to find. The Australian can reveal the modelling, to be discussed at a meeting of national cabinet on Friday, conducted analysis of three scenarios over a 180-day period based on Covid case numbers in the tens, hundreds & thousands when restrictions were lifted and found no material difference in expected fatality rates."
Evidence - Iceland
 
Also important to remind people that it’s a min 80%. But we don’t stop there. Ideally we‘ll get to > 90%.
And that is why they need those carrots & sticks (vaccine passport mainly - aka "fun pass")
 
And that is why they need those carrots & sticks (vaccine passport mainly - aka "fun pass")
Also there's an increasing issue with employment. For example, at my work we are standing down three staff who won't meet the requirement to come to our depot because they live in an LGAOC and refuse to get vaccinated. We can't implement Rapid Antigen Testing without blowing our budget even more (that's even if we could get any RATs and we need someone to administer them).

United DL have announced that unvaccinated employees will have $200 per month deducted from their pay to allow for testing requirements for them.

Lots of measures in place to drive up vaccination to make sure we hit 80%

 
Last edited:
United have announced that unvaccinated employees will have $200 per month deducted from their pay to allow for testing requirements for them.
That's an interesting one that will presumably end up being challenged in a court, presumably?
 
Also there's an increasing issue with employment. For example, at my work we are standing down three staff who won't meet the requirement to come to our depot because they live in an LGAOC and refuse to get vaccinated. We can't implement Rapid Antigen Testing without blowing our budget even more (that's even if we could get any RATs and we need someone to administer them).

United DL have announced that unvaccinated employees will have $200 per month deducted from their pay to allow for testing requirements for them.

Lots of measures in place to drive up vaccination to make sure we hit 80%

I attended a session yesterday where the discussion was focused on what an employer's liability could be under safe work laws if they don't mandate vaccines or otherwise take reasonable measures to protect employees from COVID. It's a complicated topic and somewhat depends on risk of activities (which include office set up and air flow), but I found it encouraging to see that employers may come to the conclusion that they have to insist on vaccines as I think this will push more over the line.
 
That doesn't mean that their experience is irrelevant.

It definitely demonstrates the effectiveness of the vaccines but we shouldn't expect 0 deaths will be the norm. They also have a very robust contact trace system to isolate positive cases.

The UK is having 100 deaths a day and slowly increasing. Adjusted for population we'd be looking at 40+ .
 
Last edited:
But COVID deaths on their own are a relatively useless statistic in a society with rampant COVID (where one is very likely to be infected) because there are a lot of people with chronic conditions that may die with COVID but not necessarily of COVID. Equally you do have people with chronic conditions who get COVID and it sadly brings their life to an earlier end.

Strikes me that a long term trend of excess deaths is likely a better metric for a country such as the UK or perhaps Israel? Although, obvious in Australia we are not proposing to do away with all restrictions like the UK for example.

This is an interesting graph and you could probably pick a graph to suit whatever argument you want to make, really for opening borders or keeping them closed. I think it's pretty obvious that any level of virus is going to lead to excess deaths. However in Australia we have COVID already in NSW and VIC, and lockdowns are barely keeping a lid on it. Will overseas travel make that much difference?

1630044522819.png
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top