markis10
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2004
- Posts
- 30,567
- Qantas
- LT Gold
As far as I'm aware, EK have publicly stated that they need/are expecting more A380s.
Considering they have close to 50 and 90 more on order....
As far as I'm aware, EK have publicly stated that they need/are expecting more A380s.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Considering they have close to 50 and 90 more on order....
The day QF give up SYD/MEL-LHR is the day QF will sign their own death warrant. End of story. Pack up and go home.
These are pretty profitable routes also, along with SYD-LAX.
As for 388 to SCL and JNB? Highly unlikely. Way too much capacity for relatively unprofitable routes. Likely 789 candidates.
Really? How many European airlines no longer fly to Australia, are they dead?The day QF give up SYD/MEL-LHR is the day QF will sign their own death warrant. End of story. Pack up and go home.
Considering they have close to 50 and 90 more on order....
Really? How many European airlines no longer fly to Australia, are they dead?
Long haul is a very complex beast these days. Low fares rules the skies, if you can't make a profit running your own operation then what is the point - it's much easier to make money as a middle man on a codeshare...
Really? How many European airlines no longer fly to Australia, are they dead?
Long haul is a very complex beast these days. Low fares rules the skies, if you can't make a profit running your own operation then what is the point - it's much easier to make money as a middle man on a codeshare...
Really? How many European airlines no longer fly to Australia, are they dead?
Long haul is a very complex beast these days. Low fares rules the skies, if you can't make a profit running your own operation then what is the point - it's much easier to make money as a middle man on a codeshare...
How many people have flown on an EK code now they get WP benefits that would never have spent a cent on an EK flight?
We don't know for sure that SYD-LHR is profitable, do we?Quite simply, their network would be so small nobody would stay with QF. These routes are still quite profitable (SYD-LHR, maybe not so much MEL). It's the flow on effect. Who would pool points in a FF scheme for an airline which only flies to Asia and the US?
Making money on codeshares is not all that lucrative, especially when your pax just decide to buy the code share airline's flights directly for less. How many people have flown on an EK code now they get WP benefits that would never have spent a cent on an EK flight?
And contrary to a non-loyal occasional Y traveller's belief, some people aren't just driven by fares.
Interesting post in another thread (re: announcement Feb 27th) that triggered my interest.
The 777 might also be a good a/c to allow QF to route to LHR via LAX and terminate the 380s at DXB (with onward codeshare to LHR).
Why would they want to do this? For LHR-bound passengers, it's a longer flight than via DXB, and a USA transit is a total pain in the cough. There's already lots of competition on LAX-LHR, so I doubt there's too much money to be made on that segment.
As far as I'm aware, EK have publicly stated that they need/are expecting more A380s.
Yes, but most of those (the latest order at Dubai airshow) are for delivery a fair way into the future (2020+).
I was suggesting they could get hold of Qantas's remaining frames a lot sooner.
Airbus CEO Fabrice Bregier said in Dubai that the order will help to fill open production slots, although not all the details including delivery timing have been sorted out. Airbus has been trying for some time to fill “a handful” of 2015 production slots. Around 25 aircraft are to be delivered this year and the rate is supposed to be ramped up to 30 annually in order to achieve operational break-even by 2015. That guidance does not take into account the multi-billion production costs for the program.
Seems to be working for NZ, they may be two hours closer but I also believe a lot of traffic does both the UK and USA in one trip.
From To Distance 2 segment path: AKL (37°00'29"S 174°47'30"E) LAX (33°56'33"N 118°24'29"W) (NE) LAX (33°56'33"N 118°24'29"W) LHR (51°28'39"N 0°27'41"W) (NE) 2 segment path: AKL (37°00'29"S 174°47'30"E) SIN (1°21'33"N 103°59'22"E) (W) SIN (1°21'33"N 103°59'22"E) LHR (51°28'39"N 0°27'41"W) (NW) 2 segment path: AKL (37°00'29"S 174°47'30"E) DXB (25°15'10"N 55°21'52"E) (W) DXB (25°15'10"N 55°21'52"E) LHR (51°28'39"N 0°27'41"W) (NW) 2 segment path: SYD (33°56'46"S 151°10'38"E) LAX (33°56'33"N 118°24'29"W) (NE) LAX (33°56'33"N 118°24'29"W) LHR (51°28'39"N 0°27'41"W) (NE) 2 segment path: SYD (33°56'46"S 151°10'38"E) SIN (1°21'33"N 103°59'22"E) (NW) SIN (1°21'33"N 103°59'22"E) LHR (51°28'39"N 0°27'41"W) (NW) 2 segment path: SYD (33°56'46"S 151°10'38"E) DXB (25°15'10"N 55°21'52"E) (W) DXB (25°15'10"N 55°21'52"E) LHR (51°28'39"N 0°27'41"W) (NW) 2 segment path: MEL (37°40'24"S 144°50'36"E) LAX (33°56'33"N 118°24'29"W) (NE) LAX (33°56'33"N 118°24'29"W) LHR (51°28'39"N 0°27'41"W) (NE) 2 segment path: MEL (37°40'24"S 144°50'36"E) SIN (1°21'33"N 103°59'22"E) (NW) SIN (1°21'33"N 103°59'22"E) LHR (51°28'39"N 0°27'41"W) (NW) 2 segment path: MEL (37°40'24"S 144°50'36"E) DXB (25°15'10"N 55°21'52"E) (W) DXB (25°15'10"N 55°21'52"E) LHR (51°28'39"N 0°27'41"W) (NW)
[TH="colspan: 2"]Initial
Heading [/TH]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 11960 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]50.0°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 6504 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]34.1°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 5456 mi[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 11990 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]282.8°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 5225 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]322.4°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 6765 mi[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 12244 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]275.1°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 8824 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]317.2°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 3421 mi[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 12944 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]61.2°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 7488 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]34.1°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 5456 mi[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 10672 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]298.4°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 3908 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]322.4°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 6765 mi[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 10901 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]288.4°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 7481 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]317.2°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 3421 mi[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 13377 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]65.3°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 7921 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]34.1°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 5456 mi[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 10508 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]306.2°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 3744 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]322.4°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 6765 mi[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 10651 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]290.6°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 7231 mi[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]317.2°[/TD]
[TD="align: right"] 3421 mi[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Total:[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="align: right"]105248 mi[/TD]
B737-400 TJI leaves MEL on Monday 03/02 for retirement.
Should leave only 2 -400's left. TJS,TJX.
We don't know for sure that SYD-LHR is profitable, do we?
SYD-LHR and SYD-LAX have been the stars of QFi for quite some time. Many other routes are subsidised by these.
A smart decision was not to give up lucrative LHR slots which they lease to make extra cash too.
Many of the poor performing routes are of QFs own making, with poor equipment decisions and sub-standard hard product. Anywhere they are running a 767 a case in point.
Chances are that QFi can never be profitable when in competition with Asian and ME airlines. So if you are Qantas use your great brand name to sell tickets under code share as you suggest and focus on domestic and the small number of routes where you can make money and stop trying to show off by flying to LHR.
The North American carriers are all second rate so hit that market hard where you stand a chance of competing and where the brand name is held in high regard and where you will be the sole Oneworld carrier. LAX, YVR, DFW, HNL, maybe SFO and JFK.