justinbrett
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2006
- Posts
- 9,874
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- Star Alliance
- Gold
Frankly this topic is going in circles
From the SMH:
Transport Minister Catherine King’s decision to reject Qatar’s bid has been criticised by key figures from the aviation and tourism sectors – including Sydney Airport’s outgoing chief and Flight Centre boss Graham ‘Skroo’ Turner – who say the federal government has failed to clarify why the application was rejected on “national interest” grounds.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Tuesday defended King’s decision, describing it as “business as usual”. “There’s nothing unusual about air services agreements that are agreements which are country to country,” Albanese told ABC radio in WA.
“When I was transport minister, there were a range of proposals put forward that weren’t agreed to because ministers need to make the assessments at the time.”
Assistant minister for competition Andrew Leigh has also come to King’s defence. Speaking at the National Press Club on Tuesday, Leigh played a straight bat when pressed on the definition of “national interest”.
“There was no single decisive factor, she [King] made it in the national interest. I don’t have anything to add to that,” he said.
However, the Labor frontbencher added that he hoped to see greater competition in the aviation sector to drive down airfares.
“I would hope to see more airline competition in Australia,” he said.
And then the VA CEO saying "Qatar today has 23 per cent, and it would add maybe 2 per cent share to their total capacity between here and Europe by adding these additional services.". Which kinds of kills the "drop fares by 40%" argument.
From the SMH:
Transport Minister Catherine King’s decision to reject Qatar’s bid has been criticised by key figures from the aviation and tourism sectors – including Sydney Airport’s outgoing chief and Flight Centre boss Graham ‘Skroo’ Turner – who say the federal government has failed to clarify why the application was rejected on “national interest” grounds.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Tuesday defended King’s decision, describing it as “business as usual”. “There’s nothing unusual about air services agreements that are agreements which are country to country,” Albanese told ABC radio in WA.
“When I was transport minister, there were a range of proposals put forward that weren’t agreed to because ministers need to make the assessments at the time.”
Assistant minister for competition Andrew Leigh has also come to King’s defence. Speaking at the National Press Club on Tuesday, Leigh played a straight bat when pressed on the definition of “national interest”.
“There was no single decisive factor, she [King] made it in the national interest. I don’t have anything to add to that,” he said.
However, the Labor frontbencher added that he hoped to see greater competition in the aviation sector to drive down airfares.
“I would hope to see more airline competition in Australia,” he said.
Virgin boss rubbishes Joyce’s Qatar claims while PM defends transport minister
The airline’s chief executive Jayne Hrdlicka says adding more seats will push down sky-high overseas airfares – increasing demand for international travel.
www.smh.com.au
And then the VA CEO saying "Qatar today has 23 per cent, and it would add maybe 2 per cent share to their total capacity between here and Europe by adding these additional services.". Which kinds of kills the "drop fares by 40%" argument.