I disagree. If you are going to actively choose to engage with stakeholders, you should do it consistently. This benefits everyone.
If you can remove confusion you should do so.
If you can contact the relevant department, you should do so.
What is the advantage of your potential 'endorser' stakeholder base not having the best information they can?
Members on AFF not only decide their own travel, but also influence the travel decisions of others.
Without solutions to real problems (and there have been plenty highlighted on AFF), you can't necessarily expect people to endorse your product.
There is nothing DYKWIA about it.
My opinion is that best practice is to deal with the range of issues, not just those which are potentially easier.