Just my input now.
This situation is cough and completly avoidable. Yes the OP didn't do the right thing and didn't have an ESTA, but the way in which virgin delt with this is just unacceptable.
Virgin can open the flight and check him in.
Virgin can move the flight to the next one without any hassle or charges what so ever.
Virgin can only check-in one sector if needed.
Virgin could've stepped up and offered to help with the situation. (this isn't the first time and won't be the last).
No matter what was paid, the passenger expects the same service as a full fare ticket, so that is NOT an excuse.
Virgin issuing the boarding pass for just the domestic sector wouldn't have any issue with getting the OP back to the original airport if esta didn't approve. It's a domestic flight, no requirements for these flights.
As 'the Insider' I've seen your insightful observations elsewhere about airline operations, and have appreciated them.
So, are you saying from an authoritative and personal knowledge point of view that:
* In Australia, you
can be allowed to check in on the domestic sector of an international flight that is to the USA, without an ESTA? The computer will allow it?
* You
can be short checked to the departure port (without an ESTA) without being checked through to the international leg?
* What is the process of re-opening a flight (who says what to whom... who has the say?) and at what point does it become 'un-openable' for late arrivals (ie pax's own fault, not an emergency etc)
... genuine questions. If you can add certainty to those issues, we'll all be better informed.
But if not, then saying Virgin 'can' do this and that is moot. The passenger 'can' be organised as well. In your opinion, how long after a flight is closed do you think its reasonable for it to be re-opened for a passenger who hasn't complied with flight documentation in time? At what point do all those who have arrived on time etc ceased to be inconvenienced for the one who is disorganised?
I'm sorry to those others on this thread who I also respect who don't like the so-called negativity expressed. But the thread opened up with some pretty negative and I think unjustified comments about the airline (of which I'm no routine defender!!), so I think it was always going to be a bit of an arm wrestle. I like a rant against an airline as much as the next person, but I don't think I've had one where the source of the problem was me and if I did, I think I might be a bit more self-depreciatory.