I don't recall working at a place where people are openly discussing job interviews and management is aware. This can't be good for morale but management encourages people to leave if not happy. Sad really.
Yeah, looking back now they really spoiled the dining experience, didn't they Shame we didnt do something after the first night, gut feel and all that.The Diana watch fest continues with tonight's Inside St Paul's on SBS. Interesting hearing David Emanuel talking about the dress! And Pushka he doesn't look at all like our dinner companion on QM2 (long story - wifey was saying that he was the designer)
Though she did create lots of good talking matterYeah, looking back now they really spoiled the dining experience, didn't they Shame we didnt do something after the first night, gut feel and all that.
Any opinions on "Defence Health" private insurance? First glance it looks pretty decent. https://www.defencehealth.com.au/he...gclid=CMH7_vebx9UCFdUGKgodSfgKKA&gclsrc=aw.ds
Currently forking out $617 / month ..... top cover with DH is < $400 / month. Devil is always in the detail!
Don't you mean parenthesis?Desperately working at the moment to get a book out to the printers by the end of the month. After 5 years, why does it always come down to days?
Editor doing a fantastic job, but I could do without 15 minute discussions on the phone on whether "1,000" should be written like that, or "1000". The style manual says "1000" but historians write "1,000". We haven't resolved that one. After that, we move onto a discussions such as whether "ibid" is "ibid" or "ibid." or "ibid." Apparently this turns on whether the Latin is written whole (in which case its italicised without a full stop) or as an abbreviation (in which case its not italicised, and comes with a fill stop).
If an archive source doesn't publish its suggested format for citing their documents, do we follow the local state archive format, or do what we like? That's good for about two cups of coffee, time wise.
Don't get me started on which type of bracket to use.
On the positive side, the Governor has just agreed to do the launch.
It shouldn't be a major issue in the basic veneer.
But it goes deeper in the execution.
Should an Islamic* preacher be able to refuse to marry an Islamic* GLTB couple on religious grounds?
* Or a preacher of any other generally recognised faith.
Don't you mean parenthesis?
No ... apparently its a matter of
Ahem, while we're being pedants: No ... apparently it's a matter of... :mrgreen:
Sheesh ... everyone's an editor now, are they?
Or management can find out what's wrong and try to fix the issues? No that would be too easy. It's much easier to alienate everyone and not care why people are unhappy.Sitting on the management side myself, I can see why that might happen. It's because if they're not happy they negatively impact the rest of the team, so if they're not happy - ship out!
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
jdjdjdjjdjdj
View attachment 103585
Wind chill pretty bad again this morning. I don't understand how people get about in t-shirts. I can feel the chill with 3 layers of clothing.
Don't quite understand why people leave their rubbish on the seats on public transport. Why not take it with you and put it in rubbish bin?
exactly this.
Half a day in parliament and the vote could have been passed. Instead it just makes Australia look backward. Marriage equality is a huge matter of principle, but it shouldn't be a major issue.