Rocket09
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2014
- Posts
- 578
A 2010 was advertised but you got a 2012? If so you've paid $2.50 a bottle more than you should have, as the 2012 sold for $22.50 a bottle about 6 weeks ago.
It's a shame the description given by Vinomofo didn't match the wine at the time. Based on the description given it could not have been the 2010 Hannah's Swing. Vinomofo are becoming increasingly misleading and deceptive in the information they provide. This certainly isn't the first time they've provided incorrect information about a black market wine. When it had occurred previously I had thought it may have been accidental, but this cannot be the case as it has now occurred several times.
I thought it did match the description of the previous 2012 vintage ( which I purchased) but at $25 instead of $22.50 which is why I mentioned it could of been an older vintage perhaps. I wish I had of known as I would of paid the extra for the 2010.