If the Uber driver is processing GST on the fare (ie. collecting it for the ATO) then the numbers given up thread dont make sense. Ie:
Customer books Uber for free using the app = Uber $0 received = $0 GST.
Pax incurs ride fare of $9. Uber collects this 90c GST. Pax pays 9.90 and walks away.
Uber keeps its fee for making the service available, etc. 25% of $9 = $2.25 (and should pay company tax on this service delivered in Aus, but I assume they claim the pax-driver matching and billing services "occur" in the Bahamas or some such). Uber also pays Amex, PayPal etc. for each txn. I assume the mapping provider (Google?), marketing, staff, etc are deductible against this "profit".
Driver should receive $9.90 - $2.25 = $7.65 of which $0.90 is passed on to the ATO as GST, pocketing $6.75 before expenses (ie. 75% of the actual $9 ex-GST fare).
Ps. I dont agree that this is fair. Seems from what Skyring wrote that Uber uses another way of calculating it.
I've checked. Here's a direct copy from a pay statement with no incentive payments, so it's all fare. I only worked three days (four hours per day) this particular week before heading off on a trip; normally it's a fair bit higher.
- Trip Earnings AU$314.03
- Fare AU$402.28
- Booking fee and other contributions (deduction) - AU$0.60
- Booking fee and other contributions (payment) + AU$0.60
- Surge + AU$16.44
- Uber Fee AU$104.69
- Incentives & Other Payments AU$0.00
Total Payout AU$314.03
The 60c "Booking fee" is ride-splitting for one ride. Uber pays me and takes it back, but I still have to pay GST on it. Only a few cents, but that's not the point. Uber pays no GST at all, and I can't claw back those few cents from Uber any more than the ATO can.
$402.28 fare + $16.44 surge = $418.72 gross. They keep a quarter of that, which is $104.68, leaving me $314.04 nett. I have to pay 1/11th of the total fare (fare + 10% GST), which is $38.06. $314.04 - $38.06 = $275.98. I'm paying Uber's share of the GST.
The only tax that Uber pays in Australia is fringe benefits for a small number of employees - who get worked like dogs, I've got to say - and whatever expenses they incur on their few offices, manned part-time - so they'll be paying a little GST on power, rent, phone charges and so on. Their income from passengers is paid straight to some holding company in the Netherlands, and I think they pay a little tax on two or three nominal employees there.
Hmm. Can you rent your car from an unrelated entity, Skyring enterprises, who charge ridiculous rates for such a car. Turns out you spend so much on it that you perpetually turn a loss...
I could, but I'm not really in it for the money. I wouldn't do it without some return, of course, but I enjoy getting up early in the morning, driving around Canberra for a few hours before the traffic gets thick. So long as I get enough back to pay for the car, whatever is left over is gravy on top of the pension.
TCO for a reasonable car is $250 a week. I make that easily.
But you make a good point. Some drivers have been seduced into leasing a new car, through some scheme Uber has arranged. Nothing up front and they slide behind the wheel of a shiny new Micra. But they are paying well over TCO for such a car, and at the end they have to give it back! Very likely these are the guys trying to live off Uber, and it's a mug's game. These are probably the same guys who are doing their best to create fake surges and who will not make the slightest effort to find a passenger, cancelling five minutes and one second after arrival, so as to pocket the $10.00 cancellation fee.
They have to pay for the car, pay all the associated costs of fuel and maintenance, pay the GST, and still find enough to be able to eat and put a roof over their heads. For a retired guy like me who owns his own home, it's fun. For someone trying to get ahead, raise a family, it's a grind.
Skyring, As a former Cabbie,
How does Ubers 25℅ take compare to a regular taxi once you take into account booking, Radi fees etc (presumably if anything Ubers infrastructure cost is less)
On an hourly basis, it's pretty much the same. In Canberra cabbies get half the meter amount and the owner of the car pays all the fuel and maintenance. Uber fares are about two-thirds of taxi rates.
Either way, it's still pitiful.
But Uber is on a sweet deal. They get 25% of all the fares, they pay zero tax, they have minimal expenses. A few staff here and in the Netherlands, a few token offices, all the work is done through computing power and cellphone data, and you may be sure that they have found the cheapest possible ways to do this.
I find it amusing (read appalling) that uber has surge pricing but Sunday workers get their penalty rates cut by the misnamed fair rights commission.
Chalk and cheese. Uber is playing market forces of supply and demand. Regardless of when it happens, surge pricing is based on number of passengers wanting a ride and number of cars on the road. Wednesday lunchtime or Saturday midnight, it's no difference.
But weekend penalty rates are artificial. Nowadays a Sunday isn't what it used to be. It's just another shopping day. Why should a retail or food worker get paid more for working on one day over another? Is there something special about their working on a Sunday that isn't found on a Tuesday?