Abbott in Government

[Pukka]

The government has provided no evidence either way as to whether it's working or not. It's time that underlings such as Morrison were removed and somebody more senior and better equipped given his role. There are probably a few women idly cooling their heels on the back-bench who could do a better job.

It's working it says so in the Jakarta post


Sent from my iPhone using AustFreqFly

 

[BadgerBoi]

It's working it says so in the Jakarta post


Sent from my iPhone using AustFreqFly

It's a sad day when even the most one-eyed of this L-Plate government's sheep-like supporters are forced to admit that the Jakarta Post is the source they use for news of what's happening in our country

 

[drsmithy]

Like you none of the reviewers have read the book.

Why would you need to read it to know the ideas espoused within are abhorrent and broken ?

You only need to spend five minutes listening to him talk to know what an oxygen thief he is.

 

[Pukka]

It's a sad day when even the most one-eyed of this L-Plate government's sheep-like supporters are forced to admit that the Jakarta Post is the source they use for news of what's happening in our country

So you admit it's working then lol


Sent from my iPhone using AustFreqFly

 

[Pushka]

No problem, we hear what's going on from the Jakarta Post than we ever would from one of President Credlin's underlings.

It's a sad day when even the most one-eyed of this L-Plate government's sheep-like supporters are forced to admit that the Jakarta Post is the source they use for news of what's happening in our country

You're the one reading Jakarta Post.

 

[JohnK]

Re: Oz Federal Election 2013 - Discussion and Comments

Time to unsubscribe again, before my inbox becomes inundated.

It was great for ~3 weeks.

I wish this thread stopped appearing in New Posts! Any way to put the thread on ignore?

 

[BadgerBoi]

You're the one reading Jakarta Post.

Never read it. I understand from the right-whingers on aff that it's the best place to catch up with the latest from One Term Tony's boys' club. Are you saying that the right-whinge here is not to be trusted?

 

[Pushka]

People bang on in here about biassed reporting by the media so really there's no loss, is there.

 

[BadgerBoi]

So you admit it's working then lol


Sent from my iPhone using AustFreqFly

So you admit that it's not then lol

 

[Pukka]

Re: Oz Federal Election 2013 - Discussion and Comments

This thread has a new fresh feel to it for 2014!!!

Or maybe not....

Same old LWNJ's

 

[BadgerBoi]

Re: Oz Federal Election 2013 - Discussion and Comments

This thread has a new fresh feel to it for 2014!!!

Or maybe not....

Same old LWNJ's

...same old right-whinge sheeple

 

[drron]

And where did I say, or even imply that I had? Typical rwnj jumping to conclusions based on what he'd like to see in my post rather than what was actually written.

Some of the reviewers actually state that they've read the book, or pamphlet as it's often been described. It's deceitful to say otherwise.

And even the most rabid rwnj would have to admit that some of those reviews are damned funny. Lighten up, there's a good chap.

Your quote of a review was one where the reviewer admitted to not reading it.Hence my statement.
And just for the record my post was not supporting the Senator.
I still believe though that he has as much right to an opinion as medhead-though I disagree with both of them.As in a country with free speech is my right.

Sorry to all the others but my comments have stirred up the left wing gang of 5 ... .

 

[JohnK]

Sorry to all the others but my comments have stirred up the left wing gang of 5 ...

Yes it is all your fault. Now I am going to have nightmares with this thread. :mrgreen:

 

[BadgerBoi]

Your quote of a review was one where the reviewer admitted to not reading it.Hence my statement...

...that none of the reviewers had read the book. Unquote.

Backpedal all you want, nobody's going to fall for it.

 

[BadgerBoi]

Yes it is all your fault. Now I am going to have nightmares with this thread. :mrgreen:

Ive lost count of how many people are now in DRone's mythical gang of five, but I think it's the first time I've been included. I'm sure that I'd be flattered if I could give a cough

 

[Pushka]

the sound of tinkling glass

 

[BadgerBoi]

I wouldn't worry. It's just projection on his part to attempt to distract from the bullying that he and his mates engage in. Typical, ignore the issues and make it personal.

I have a personal interest in bullying, and (politics per this thread aside) the use of the word as a weapon in the way that he did in his post is nothing less than offensive. To try to deflect his error by accusing others of forming gangs and bullying is beyond the pale.

a lot of this thread and its predecessor is bullsht and bravado from both sides, and quite amusing, but bullying is a different issue.

 

[drron]

I have a personal interest in bullying, and (politics per this thread aside) the use of the word as a weapon in the way that he did in his post is nothing less than offensive. To try to deflect his error by accusing others of forming gangs and bullying is beyond the pale.

a lot of this thread and its predecessor is bullsht and bravado from both sides, and quite amusing, but bullying is a different issue.

Did you notice the smilies?
Have you read all medhead's posts?
He is the one who used the gang of 5 bullies when there is and was nothing of the sort.
Mine was a sarcastic retort.Pure and simple.

As to my error-you brought up the Amazon reviews.All are either 5 or 1 star.Nothing in between and you are trying to represent them as fair and unbiased.Have I got a bridge for you.

 

[BadgerBoi]

As to my error-you brought up the Amazon reviews.All are either 5 or 1 star.Nothing in between and you are trying to represent them as fair and unbiased.Have I got a bridge for you.

So, when you said that none of those people who reviewed Bernardi's pamphlet had read it, you actually meant that only the reviewer that I quoted hadn't read it. Thanks for the clarification, but how does that work?

And for the record, all of the Amazon reviews of Corgi's pamphlet are not either five or one star, just the bulk of them. Is it going to be necessary for every statement that you make on AFF to be fact checked ?

 

[drron]

So, when you said that none of those people who reviewed Bernardi's pamphlet had read it, you actually meant that only the reviewer that I quoted hadn't read it. Thanks for the clarification, but how does that work?

And for the record, all of the Amazon reviews of Corgi's pamphlet are not either five or one star, just the bulk of them. Is it going to be necessary for every statement that you make on AFF to be fact checked ?

Ah but you calling what I say is offensive is fine.
And when I checked amazon there were no 2,3 or 4 star reviews.it may well have changed.
Of course there are a few that say they have read the book but then add things like I found it in the gutter.Personally I don't believe them