Mrmaxwell
Established Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2007
- Posts
- 1,312
- Qantas
- Platinum 1
Disagree. The paying customer should not have to wait for 36 months while a carrier refurbs one plane at a time.
If I was paying LCC fares then I would have no issue whatsoever, but the fact is many of these asian routes are being priced at top dollar (e.g. MNL-SYD this week is $1670 = one way - what a joke!)
View attachment 52696
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Disagree. The paying customer should not have to wait for 36 months while a carrier refurbs one plane at a time.
Disagree. The paying customer should not have to wait for 36 months while a carrier refurbs one plane at a time.
So what's your plan then???
Build 10 brand new hangers in Brisbane
Hire and train up 1000 new engineers
Have the suppliers work for 6m to produce 3000 seats...............
................
So what's your plan then???
What's my plan? Who cares...I am not the business with the highly paid executives - that is their job.
Their plan should be customer service and customer satisfaction first and everything else second. Not to refurb old plane but buy new ones, not to send new tech (787) to their LCC but send it to service their premium routes, and in turn customers who are paying top dollar for fares.
I am sure you are with me in saying I don't expect to be paying $1000+ for 8hr flights only to rock up and be greeted with a 10-13yr old aircraft with sub-standard IFE and dirty, hard seats combined with the slop passed as cabin food in a box.
Sorry if you think I am jaded but I've been reading about this A330 upgrade since 2013 and now that it directly affects me I see the whole thing as pretty average from a so-called national carrier. Every decision made over the last few years screams 'save money' and when that becomes core of the business then customer sat will fall.
Not to refurb old plane but buy new ones,
..... only to rock up and be greeted with a 10-13yr old aircraft with sub-standard IFE and dirty, hard seats combined with the slop passed as cabin food in a box.
Sorry if you think I am jaded.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with a 10-year-old aircraft that is well-maintained.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with a 10-year-old aircraft that is well-maintained. Let me tell you, I would much prefer a 10-year-old B744 to the unreliable "new" A380!
Inside the cabin however, ten years may as well be an eternity.
just an observation.. if you stop 'feeding a beast', the beast will eventually move on!!
Cabins can date very quickly on any aircraft due to the shear number of pigs that are allowed in the cabin, even in business and first. Unfortunately it is not economically viable to replace the aircraft or the cabins frequently enough so they wear, pure and simple. And when it comes to cleanlness again only certain times when aircraft can be given a good spring clean.
I dunno about that - I have never been in a CX, JL, NH cabin that has shown major signs of wear... and JL/NH did a great job of refreshing their 767s with modern Boeing interiors (including full-sized lockers). The QF refresh was pretty poor in comparison, with the cabin quickly showing signs of wear, and poor IFE.