Ethiopian 737 Max 8 crash and Fallout

We have no context for reading these messages, nor do we have the complete message, so you shouldn't draw too many conclusions. He could well have been talking about the simulator failing to replicate the aircraft...or perhaps the sim was accurately replicating what the aircraft would do, but Boeing didn't realise that that would be the aircraft's behaviour.

You need to be very careful comparing simulator behaviour to an actual aircraft. Sims are programmed to react to known aircraft behaviour, and don't work it out for themselves as you go. So, if you want to know what the aircraft will do in certain circumstances, then the sim will not give you an answer unless it has previously been programmed with a result. As an example, back in 2010, I had a dual air data computer failure in an A380. The sim had been programmed to respond to that by dropping to alternate law 1, with all automatics still available. But, the actual aircraft behaviour was different, with it dropping to alternate law 2, and the loss of all automatics. One had very little effect on workload, whilst the other increased it dramatically.
 
AviatorInsight said:
The AD requires airframes with 30,000 flight cycles or greater to be inspected within 7 days and airframes with greater than 22,600 cycles to be inspected within the next 1000 flight cycles.

To hopefully put some minds at ease, closer to home, VOK, VON, VOL and VOM all have greater than 30,000 flight cycles. These aircraft were inspected last weekend and no cracks found. The next 3 highest aircraft VOT, VOS and VUA were also inspected with no cracks found. The remainder of the fleet will be inspected in the next few weeks. At this point world wide data shows the latest line number where cracking has been found is 998. Our earliest line number (VOK) is 1359.

Boeing have not yet determined the cause of the cracking...
Click to expand...

Update, engineering have now completed all inspections for aircraft with cycles greater than 20,000. No cracks were found during any of the inspections. The engineering department will now be including repeat pickle fork inspections in the NG maintenance program.

On a global basis, 1043 aircraft have been inspected and 51 have been found to have cracks.
 
AviatorInsight said:
On a global basis, 1043 aircraft have been inspected and 51 have been found to have cracks.
Click to expand...

That's a much higher rate than I would have expected given that it's supposed to be a build and forget component. I wonder what changed to cause the issue.
 
Check out the latest credit card signup bonus point offers
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Quickstatus said:
These pickle forks structurally connect the fuselage to the wing spar?
Could hard landings cause such cracks?
Click to expand...

Perhaps, but given that I'm sure all of the 737 models prior to the NG have had their share of hard landings, without pickle issues, I doubt that it's the problem. I'll use my favour word here, but I expect that the pickles are grandfathered from earlier designs. The wings and engines (and so loadings) have changed dramatically over the years.
 
There will be a lot of causes. One that prune is calling the MDC cancer relates to management.

The incidence of issues is amazingly high. It will be interesting to see what happens here.
 
Yet to read the article, but the first par is common to many organisations these days (universities, albeit in a slightly different way, immediately come to mind). I know the image on the front has been turned, but it sends shivers down my spine...
 
From the New Republic article: '...it was, after all, the world’s first self-hijacking plane.' 😟
 
Well this article mentions the cultural impact of the Boeing-MD merger, although no doubt there would be many others also.

Quite a compelling read, This was remarkable...
Boeing had not only outfitted the MAX with a deadly piece of software; it had also taken the additional step of instructing pilots to respond to an erroneous activation of the software by literally attempting the impossible. MCAS alone had taken twelve minutes to down Lion Air 610; in the Ethiopian crash, the MCAS software, overridden by pilots hitting the cutout switches as per Boeing’s instructions, had cut that time line in half.
Click to expand...

Skip
 
I feel quite ill after that article. If planes are being delivered with cracked windows and loose screws there is a fundamental breakdown in QA. MAX aircraft aside how safe are the newer aircraft really?
 
I love to travel said:
I feel quite ill after that article. If planes are being delivered with cracked windows and loose screws there is a fundamental breakdown in QA. MAX aircraft aside how safe are the newer aircraft really?
Click to expand...
Have a look at the issues surrounding the 767 tanker (a disaster), and the P-8. Whilst I loved the 767/747, and classic 777, I don’t think they make anything that I’d buy these days. All manufacturers have issues, it’s just that Boeing seem to have made issues their goal, as opposed to avoiding them.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Recent Posts

Currently Active Users

Total: 211 (members: 13, guests: 198)
Back
Top