- Joined
- Nov 16, 2004
- Posts
- 47,516
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- SkyTeam
- Elite Plus
The real issue was with the non public polling commissioned by Labour. While the Published polls indicated a win under KRudd10, this internal party polling was indicating the loss of at least 18 labor seats - well more than the 13 required to change government.
Currently, neither party should get their hopes up on todays published Galaxy poll - there's a ±3½% (or a 7% range) margin of error in that.
As for Monday's Newspoll published earlier this week, it had a ±3% margin of error. As noted there also is an issue in the distribution of preferences from the 25% of voters who indicated neither The Coalition or Labour. For the published two party preferred, it was based on how these flowed in 2007 election. Note there were 14.6% of primaray votes redistributed in 2007.
Note the Nielson poll two weeks ago was different from the Newspoll in that it asked respondents who they'd preference. This gave a 47% Labour/53% Coalition two party preferred split, rather than 52%/48% if using the 2007 distribution. Of course, this is still within the margin of error.
Currently, neither party should get their hopes up on todays published Galaxy poll - there's a ±3½% (or a 7% range) margin of error in that.
As for Monday's Newspoll published earlier this week, it had a ±3% margin of error. As noted there also is an issue in the distribution of preferences from the 25% of voters who indicated neither The Coalition or Labour. For the published two party preferred, it was based on how these flowed in 2007 election. Note there were 14.6% of primaray votes redistributed in 2007.
Note the Nielson poll two weeks ago was different from the Newspoll in that it asked respondents who they'd preference. This gave a 47% Labour/53% Coalition two party preferred split, rather than 52%/48% if using the 2007 distribution. Of course, this is still within the margin of error.