- Joined
- Nov 1, 2011
- Posts
- 37
Excellent suggestion and obvious when I think about it, many thanks!Use the onion as a scoop.
Excellent suggestion and obvious when I think about it, many thanks!Use the onion as a scoop.
SQ Suites SYD - (SIN) - LHR
I must admit the double suite is impressive in terms of the enormous open space and off course the magnificent double bed. Now I get what SQ was trying to do with the refurb. While I still think a single suite isn’t necessarily superior to F, the double suite is absolutely amazing
A truly spectacular way to fly!
View attachment 333006
View attachment 333007
View attachment 333008
View attachment 333009
View attachment 333010
View attachment 333011
View attachment 333012
View attachment 333013
View attachment 333014
View attachment 333015
My Team in Office just forwarded me this:
View attachment 333018
definitely the way to go. I even use that technique in Singapore and Thailand without getting strange looks.Use the onion as a scoop.
Please tell the crew and tell them its absolutely unacceptable that no provision for cutlery is made for the satay. Its very QF to not provide cutleryWhat is the secret of your technique
So was there a discussion re who gets to face backwards?A truly spectacular way to fly!
Oh good grief - that would be a short discussion - poor old M would not get a look inSo was there a discussion re who gets to face backwards?
So you should also be eligible to submit a claim for €600 compensation for you late arrival into MEL, per pax? unless you voluntarily rejected an much earlier arrival into MEL due to the F/J issue?So how good are SQ? I’ll tell you how freakin good they are!
Originally booked on SQ207 MEL-SIN - we had BTC lamb racks the 2 of us - due to delayed dep FRA / late arr SIN we missed connection with 207 - SQ scurried around and got us into F on 211 SIN-SYD then a connecting QF J flt SYD-MEL.
Onboard 211 now awaiting push back (bit of a delay as late sub of 777 due to mechanical issue) - but Crew just came around and advised our BTC from 207 transferred to 211
How freakin amazing is that - Customer Service taken to the extreme
ATC can be a reason for an airline to exclude EU261. Weather in and of itself is not a reason. Nor does the delay have to be ‘caused by the airline’ for a claim to be valid. ‘Bird strike’ for example does not absolve the airline from responsibility… it’s an inherent risk or running an airline and not ‘extraordinary’.Delay ex FRA was caused by traffic control not granting dep slot as allegedly bad weather somewhere en route was causing havoc - we were all onboard ready to dep - certainly not SQ causing delay - not sure how that affects any claim - not fussed really - just another exciting experience we go through
This might push Cruiser to the top SQ list of passengers most likely to feedback.there’s nothing to stop lodging a claim
FFS - no Eggs Benedict - that’s it - more feedback to SQ
View attachment 333036
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements