Hello
Thank you for the more clear information in the updated PDS pertaining to covid-19 cover, particularly by way of examples (e.g. p. 26). While it is disappointing that you have provide just a few weeks' notice, I appreciate the attempt to be more clear.
I would like to properly understand the cancellation cover (s. 2.1) and the additional expenses cover (s. 3.1) that is provided as part of the ANZ credit cards benefit Accordingly, I would appreciate clarity on the following two scenarios. Both, of course, assume I have met the eligibility criteria.
Scenario 1
I fall ill while overseas (i.e. my travel has already commenced). The medical advice is that I must rest for 5 days before continuing my travel. As a result, I incur additional accommodation expenses. It is my understanding that cover for these expenses is covered under s. 3.1. After the 5 days of prescribed rest have passed, I am able to resume my journey (not return home). Because of the 5 days of rest, I missed my onward flights. I was able to cancel those flights by telephoning the airline from my hotel at a cost of $90 (i.e. for telephone call charges) and receive a full refund of the $2,500 I previously paid, less a cancellation penalty of $500. It is my understanding that the $90 in call costs and the $500 penalty cost are covered under s. 2.1. Replacement flights to get me to where I would have been (had it not been for the prescribed rest) costs $3,500. It is my understanding that this additional $1,000 (i.e. $3,500 less the $2,500 recovered) is covered by s. 3.1.
Scenario 2
I fall ill while overseas (i.e. my travel has already commenced) and spend several hours in hospital being treated. After being discharged, I am able to resume my journey (not return home). Because of the hospital stay, I missed my flights that would have taken me to my next destination. I was able to cancel the flights and receive a full refund of the $2,500 paid. Replacement flights to get me to where I would have been, had it not been for the hospital stay, cost $3,500. It is my understanding that this additional $1,000 (i.e. $3,500 less the $2,500 recovered) is covered by s. 3.1. Is my understanding of each of the three aspects of cover correct in both scenarios? If not, I would appreciate your clarification.
Finally, I would be grateful if you could explain (perhaps by way of an example) the meaning of the following paragraph that appears after s. 3.1.1:
Whenever claims are made by you under this section and Section 2..1 Cancellation for cancelled services/facilities or alternative arrangements for the same or similar services/facilities, we will pay for the higher of the two amounts, not both.